Why Africa’s Island Destinations Remain Undervalued in the Global Travel Market

27

When travellers plan island holidays, the destinations that come to mind first are rarely African. The Maldives. Bali. The Greek islands. Barbados. These are places that have been sold to the world through decades of editorial coverage, airline marketing, and aspirational imagery. They have become default choices, not because they are objectively superior, but because the machinery of global travel media has made them feel obvious.

Africa’s islands are something else entirely. They are older in cultural history, richer in ecological diversity, and in several cases more visually dramatic than many of their celebrated rivals. The Seychelles rests on granite foundations that are among the oldest exposed rock formations on earth. Zanzibar’s Stone Town has been a living city for over a thousand years. Madagascar has been evolving in isolation for more than 80 million years, producing a wildlife catalogue found nowhere else on the planet. Cape Verde has turned a mid-Atlantic location into a full tourism economy built on music, light, and European connectivity.

These are not niche destinations for specialist travellers. They are extraordinary places that belong at the centre of the global island travel conversation. They are simply not there yet.

A Brief History of Africa’s Coastal Trading World

Africa’s coastlines and islands were among the most consequential economic zones in the pre-modern world. For centuries before European expansion, Indian Ocean trade routes connected the East African coast to the Persian Gulf, the Indian subcontinent, and Southeast Asia. Swahili city-states, including Kilwa, Mombasa, Malindi, and Zanzibar, were sophisticated commercial centres whose residents used Chinese porcelain, traded gold and ivory, and participated in oceanic commerce across distances that contemporary Europeans could barely conceptualise. These were not peripheral settlements. They were among the wealthiest urban centres of their era.

Zanzibar’s Stone Town stands as the most intact surviving expression of this world. Designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2000, the town was recognised for synthesising the architectural traditions of Africa, the Arab world, India, and Europe over more than a millennium. Its buildings, constructed from coralline ragstone and mangrove timber, reflect the meeting of civilisations that the Indian Ocean trade made possible. That same network of exchange also made Stone Town one of the principal slave-trading ports in East Africa during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, a history the town preserves honestly and that any visitor must engage with seriously.

The Seychelles has no indigenous people. The islands were uninhabited when French explorers arrived in the eighteenth century, and the population that developed there was a product of colonial settlement and the forced migration of enslaved Africans and indentured labourers. Cape Verde’s modern identity was shaped by centuries of its role as a waypoint in the Atlantic slave trade, a circumstance that produced the cultural synthesis, music, cuisine, and the particular quality of light that travellers now come to experience. In both cases, history is not a footnote to the destination. It is the destination.

Where the Numbers Stand Today

Africa received 81 million international visitors in 2025, an 8% increase on the previous year, making Africa the fastest-growing tourism region in the world, according to the UN Tourism World Tourism Barometer. In the broader global picture, Africa’s 81 million arrivals represent just over 5% of the 1.52 billion international tourists recorded globally in the same period. The continent’s share of global tourism revenue remains far below what its size, diversity, and cultural depth would justify.

Among Africa’s island destinations, Mauritius leads with 1.436 million visitors in 2025, a 4% increase on 2024. Cape Verde recorded over 1.2 million visitors in 2024, a new record supported by expanded European air connections. The Seychelles, despite its premium positioning, remains a comparatively low-volume destination. Madagascar, Comoros, and São Tomé and Príncipe receive a fraction of the visitors that their credentials could justify.

The gap between what these destinations offer and what they are realising in visitor numbers is structural, not intrinsic. As Rex Clarke Adventures has reported in its coverage of Africa’s untapped tourism potential, the problem is not the product. The problem is the pipeline.

The Connectivity Gap

Air connectivity is the single most reliable predictor of tourism growth for island destinations. Without regular, affordable routes, no marketing investment can convert interest into visits. The experience of Cape Verde demonstrates this with unusual clarity.

Cape Verde’s growth as a tourism destination correlates almost directly with the expansion of European carrier routes to the archipelago. In 2024, the United Kingdom remained the primary source market, contributing over a third of all arrivals, with services from TUI, British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, and EasyJet, whose direct London Gatwick-Sal route launched in March 2025. The government has set a target of 1.3 million visitors by 2026 and plans to invest five billion euros in sustainable tourism infrastructure through to 2030.

The contrast with Comoros, São Tomé and Príncipe, and the smaller islands of the Mozambique Channel is significant. Comoros has no direct connections from any major European hub. São Tomé and Príncipe requires either a transit through Lisbon or a routing through mainland West Africa. For a mid-range traveller weighing options, the complexity of reaching these destinations is reason enough to choose somewhere with a direct flight.

Stone Town and the Architecture of a Thousand Years

Zanzibar’s Stone Town is one of the great urban environments of the world, and most of that world has barely registered the fact. Established as a Swahili trading settlement from at least the eleventh century, Stone Town grew into a major commercial centre under the influence of Omani Arab traders, particularly after the Sultan of Oman relocated his court from Muscat to Zanzibar in the nineteenth century. The resulting townscape, built from coralline ragstone and mangrove timber, is characterised by elaborately carved wooden doors, open internal courtyards, and a street pattern dense enough to disorient visitors for days.

UNESCO’s World Heritage inscription in 2000 acknowledged Stone Town as an outstanding expression of cultural convergence across Africa, the Arab world, India, and Europe over more than a millennium. The problem is that a UNESCO inscription, without sustained editorial attention and effective support from the travel industry, does not automatically translate into visitor numbers.

The global travel media has not found a way to tell the Stone Town story with the consistency and ambition that the place deserves. It is presented most commonly as a day trip from Nungwi’s beach resorts or as a stopover on the way to a safari. Both framings diminish what Stone Town is: a city with more accumulated cultural history per square metre than almost anywhere else in Africa. Zanzibar will host the Essence of Africa 2026 forum, a signal of the island’s growing ambition to sit at the centre of the global travel trade.

Madagascar: 90% Endemic and Still Undiscovered by Tourism

Madagascar’s claim to biodiversity is not a marketing exaggeration. Research published in Science and supported by the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew confirms that more than 90% of the species found on the island are endemic, existing nowhere else on earth. The World Wildlife Fund notes that approximately 95% of Madagascar’s reptiles, 89% of its plant life, and 92% of its mammals are found only on this island. Some ecologists describe Madagascar as the eighth continent, a designation that reflects 80 million years of biological isolation.

The island covers 0.4% of the planet’s landmass but contains an estimated 5% of its total biodiversity. It is home to all of the world’s lemur species, two-thirds of the world’s chameleon species, and over 11,000 endemic plant species. For any traveller with an interest in the natural world, Madagascar offers an experience that does not exist anywhere else.

Despite this, Madagascar falls into the potential category for tourism development in international assessments, far behind the consolidating group that includes the Seychelles, Cape Verde, and Mauritius. Infrastructure limitations, poor road networks, and periodic political instability have all contributed to that gap. But the ecological case for Madagascar as a priority global destination is unanswerable, and the gap between its natural credentials and its tourism performance is one of the most striking mismatches in world travel.

The Seychelles Blueprint: Conservation as Commercial Strategy

The Seychelles has done something that most island tourism economies have not: it has established a direct financial relationship between tourism revenue and the protection of the natural environment that makes the destination worth visiting. In 2015, the government completed the world’s first debt conversion for marine protection, raising $21.6 million through The Nature Conservancy to fund the expansion of its marine-protected area network. In 2018, it issued the world’s first sovereign blue bond, raising an additional $15 million to support sustainable marine and fisheries projects.

The result is that over 30% of the Seychelles’ 1.37 million-square-kilometre exclusive economic zone is now under marine protection, according to the United Nations Development Programme. Eco-tourism generated $500 million in 2024, with 10% reinvested directly in conservation. Tourism employs 25% of the Seychellois workforce. In July 2026, the Seychelles will host the 69th Meeting of the UN Tourism Regional Commission for Africa, the first time the summit has been held on the island nation’s shores.

The Seychelles model demonstrates that an African island destination can sit at the top of the global travel market on its own terms. It also demonstrates something more important: that conservation and commercial tourism are not competing goals. They are the same goal, financed correctly.

Why Collective Branding Has Not Happened

The Caribbean is a brand. The Mediterranean is a brand. Both regions have spent generations building associations so coherent that the words alone carry emotional weight. A traveller who has never visited either already holds a detailed picture of what they offer, constructed through decades of editorial coverage, film, advertising, and word of mouth.

Africa’s islands, taken as a group, have no equivalent brand. Each destination competes for global attention individually, without the benefit of a regional identity that could generate awareness at scale. Building a collective brand would require genuine cooperation among governments, tourism boards, and the private sector, sustained over a long enough period to take hold. The UN Tourism Investment Framework for Africa identifies exactly this kind of regional coordination as a priority. As Rex Clarke Adventures has documented in its reporting on Africa’s tourism hotspots, the marketing gap is as significant as the infrastructure gap, and it will require the same sustained institutional commitment to close.

ALSO READ:

• Africa’s Tourism Triumph: 81M Visitors Fuel Global Rebound in 2025
• Zanzibar to Host Essence of Africa 2026 in Africa’s Next Tourism Power Move
• The Untapped Potential of African Tourism: Challenges, Solutions and Global Comparisons
• Africa’s Tourism Boom: Blessing or Overtourism Curse in 2025? 

What Would Actually Change This

The structural changes needed are understood. Airline connectivity must improve, and African governments have a direct role to play through bilateral air service agreements and investment in airport infrastructure that makes routes commercially viable. Collective destination marketing, pooling resources among national tourism boards under a single regional identity, would build brand awareness that no individual country can generate alone. The success of coordinated regional marketing in the Caribbean and the Mediterranean is not a coincidence. It is the result of sustained, institutional investment in narrative.

Beyond the structural, there is an editorial responsibility. Global travel media, digital platforms, tour operators, and the intermediaries who shape travel decisions have consistently underinvested in Africa’s island destinations. The dominant narrative, in which these places are luxury appendices to safari itineraries or extreme-end products accessible only to the very wealthy, serves a narrow audience. It excludes the mid-range traveller who would visit if the case were made properly. It delays the moment at which Africa’s islands take their rightful place in the global travel conversation.

Africa received 81 million international visitors in 2025, the fastest-growing regional figure on the planet. That momentum is real. The question is whether it reaches the destinations that deserve it most.

The RCA Argument

Africa’s island destinations are not undiscovered. They are undersold. The global travel industry has spent decades constructing the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, and Southeast Asia as aspirational defaults. Africa’s islands, which, in several cases, predate these destinations as centres of civilisation, trade, and cultural exchange, have been left out of that conversation.

The argument is not that African islands need better marketing. It is the editorial and commercial infrastructure that shapes travel decisions globally that has applied a systematic bias against African island destinations that no individual tourism board can overcome alone. The Seychelles cannot rebrand the continent. Cape Verde cannot speak for Madagascar. Zanzibar cannot answer for São Tomé and Príncipe. What is needed is a continental editorial voice that holds the whole picture.

Rex Clarke Adventures covers all 54 African nations. Our position is straightforward: correcting this bias is not charity toward African destinations. It is accuracy. Africa’s islands are among the finest travel destinations on earth. They have the history, the ecology, the culture, and the beauty to sit at the top of any global ranking. The gap between what they are and how the world sees them is the story this platform exists to close. Explore our full Islands and Coastal Destinations coverage on Rex Clarke Adventures.

“Tourism investment in Africa is about transforming potential into shared prosperity, connecting communities, catalysing jobs, and advancing sustainable development across the continent.”

Zurab Pololikashvili, Secretary-General, UN Tourism

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Which African island destinations have the best international flight connections?

Cape Verde, Mauritius, and the Seychelles currently offer the most developed international air connections, with direct or single-connection routes from major European and Middle Eastern hubs. Cape Verde is served from the United Kingdom by EasyJet (London Gatwick to Sal, direct, since March 2025), TUI, British Airways, and Virgin Atlantic. Zanzibar is well connected within East Africa and increasingly from Europe. Réunion benefits from its status as a French overseas territory, giving it consistent connectivity to France. Madagascar, Comoros, and São Tomé and Príncipe remain more complex to reach and require careful journey planning.

2. Is island travel in Africa accessible beyond the luxury bracket?

Yes, significantly so, though the luxury framing of many African island destinations in global media creates a misleading impression of exclusivity. Cape Verde has a mature mid-market tourism sector with accessible accommodation and package options widely available across the United Kingdom and Europe. Zanzibar offers a genuine range of price points, from budget guesthouses in Stone Town to high-end beach resorts. The Seychelles is genuinely expensive at its premium end, but self-catering options on the outer islands provide a more accessible entry point. The perception of exclusivity significantly outpaces the reality across the sector.

3. What sets African island destinations apart from the Caribbean or Mediterranean?

The most significant distinction is cultural depth and ecological rarity. Many of Africa’s island destinations carry histories of cross-cultural exchange across centuries, producing urban environments, culinary traditions, and social cultures unlike anything in the resort-centred Caribbean or the European-influenced Mediterranean. In ecological terms, Madagascar’s biodiversity, with over 90% of its species endemic to the island, and the ancient granite geology of the Seychelles’ inner islands, offer natural experiences with no equivalent anywhere else on earth.

4. How does tourism investment affect conservation in African island nations?

The connection is direct and well-documented in the case of the Seychelles. The government’s 2015 debt conversion for marine protection and its 2018 sovereign blue bond, both supported by the Global Environment Facility and The Nature Conservancy, funded marine protected areas covering over 30% of the country’s Exclusive Economic Zone. Eco-tourism revenue now contributes $500 million annually, with 10% reinvested in conservation. This demonstrates that tourism revenue, when directed through sound institutional frameworks, can be a significant driver of environmental protection rather than a threat to it.